The author expresses frustration with the 10 out of 10 reviews for Starfield, finding them strange and not reflective of lower scores elsewhere. They criticize the reviewers for lacking critical evaluation and question their qualifications, advising readers to be skeptical of game journalists.
The author of the text begins by expressing their frustration with the overwhelmingly positive 10 out of 10 reviews for the game Starfield. They argue that these reviews are strange and not reflective of the lower scores the game has received elsewhere. The author then proceeds to examine some of these alleged 10 out of 10 reviews and the reviewers themselves, hoping to find a pattern in their work. They criticize the reviewers for simply listing the features and activities in the game without critically evaluating them. The author also points out that many of these reviewers have a history of writing shallow articles and guides, lacking the necessary skills for a proper review. They highlight the problem of these reviews being more like promotional pieces rather than critical assessments. The author concludes by advising readers not to trust these reviews and to be cautious of game journalists in general.
Overall, the author criticizes the 10 out of 10 reviews for Starfield, finding them to be lacking in critical evaluation. They argue that the reviewers simply list the features of the game without analyzing their quality or value. The author also questions the qualifications of these reviewers, pointing out their history of shallow articles and guides. They suggest that these reviews are more like promotional pieces and advise readers to be skeptical of game journalists in general.