The video criticizes CIG for repeating past mistakes by releasing ship upgrade modules for sale online before they are available in-game, causing community backlash and eroding trust. The creator argues that this pattern of prioritizing monetization over player experience demonstrates a lack of learning from previous controversies, leading to ongoing frustration among players.
The video discusses recent community frustrations surrounding the launch of Invictus and the sale of ship upgrade modules exclusively on the website, which has caused significant backlash. The creator explains that players are upset because these items, such as modules for improving ship maneuverability and weapon configurations, are not yet available in-game, despite being sold online. The community’s anger is fueled by the perception that CIG is prioritizing monetary gains over player experience, leading to accusations of poor communication and a lack of transparency.
The creator highlights that this situation echoes a similar incident from nine months prior, around patch 3.240, when CIG began nerfing tractor beams and related tools. Initially, the nerfs made sense from a balance perspective, but shortly after, they released a more powerful tractor beam called the Atlas, which was only available for purchase. This move sparked community outrage, as players felt CIG was exploiting their trust by releasing a better product behind a paywall shortly after nerfing existing tools.
Further, the video points out that CIG attempted damage control by adjusting their communication, suggesting that the new items would come to in-game availability in future patches, specifically referencing a summer release. However, the community viewed this as a familiar pattern of CIG releasing powerful or desirable items for sale first, then delaying their in-game release, which erodes trust. The creator argues that this pattern indicates a lack of learning from past mistakes, as the same controversial approach is being repeated.
The creator emphasizes that the community’s outrage is justified, as it appears CIG is doubling down on the same strategy that previously caused backlash. The pattern of releasing items for sale before they are accessible in-game suggests a disregard for community feedback and a focus on monetization at the expense of player goodwill. This repeated behavior has led to widespread criticism across platforms like Spectrum and Reddit, with many players feeling betrayed.
In conclusion, the video criticizes CIG for not learning from past mistakes regarding their approach to monetization and community engagement. The creator expresses disappointment that the company seems to be repeating the same controversial tactics, which damage trust and frustrate players. They end with a note of caution for players, hoping their wallets aren’t overly impacted by these ongoing practices, and wish the audience well.