In “Star Citizen - The Crew Problem,” the host explores the challenges of multi-crew gameplay and discusses potential solutions like AI blades and NPC crews, highlighting their limitations and the developers’ focus on promoting player cooperation. While automated solutions may be preferred for low-risk tasks, the video concludes that player crews will still be essential for more complex missions, emphasizing the dynamics of trust and reliability among players.
In the video “Star Citizen - The Crew Problem,” the host discusses the challenges of multi-crew gameplay in Star Citizen, particularly focusing on the potential solutions of NPC crews and AI blades. The game features numerous ships that require multiple players to operate effectively, but players can fly these ships solo, which may hinder their performance in combat scenarios. While Star Citizen encourages group play, many players may prefer to operate without relying on others, especially for low-risk tasks. This creates a demand for alternatives to player crews.
AI blades are introduced as a proposed solution, functioning as modules that can automate specific ship functions, primarily turrets. The host suggests that AI blades could also be used for other tasks, such as controlling drones or managing refining processes. However, these modules have limitations in capacity and purpose. On the other hand, NPC crews would involve hiring physical NPCs to fill various roles on a ship, offering more versatility but at a recurring cost, as they require salaries rather than a one-time payment like AI blades.
The effectiveness of AI blades and NPC crews compared to player crews is debated. The developers appear to favor promoting player cooperation, which may result in AI and NPC performance being intentionally limited. Additionally, the current AI performance in Star Citizen can be inconsistent, influenced by server conditions. While NPC gunners may not perform optimally, the host argues that AI blades could potentially react more quickly and accurately in combat situations, making them a viable option for certain tasks.
The video also addresses why many players are reluctant to take on crew roles. Engaging in monotonous tasks, such as manning a turret, can deter players from wanting to join as crew members. However, upcoming features like physicalized cargo and damage control could make crew roles more engaging. The host emphasizes that the willingness of players to crew depends on the activity planned, with combat missions likely requiring dedicated player crews, while non-combat scenarios could see more reliance on AI blades and NPCs.
Ultimately, the video concludes that while NPC crews and AI blades could alleviate some crew shortages, they may not fully replace the need for player cooperation, especially in combat situations. The host speculates that most players will opt for automated solutions in low-risk scenarios but will still prefer player crews for more complex missions. The discussion raises questions about the balance of trust and reliability among players in crew roles and how future systems, such as reputation, might impact these dynamics in the evolving game landscape.