SaltEMike reacts to CIG’s response addressing the poor reception of the structural salvage feature in Star Citizen. He expresses concern about the simplicity and lack of player satisfaction with the feature, but also acknowledges the positive steps CIG is taking to improve it based on their response and comments.
In a video reaction, SaltEMike discusses the response from CIG (Cloud Imperium Games) regarding the poor reception of the structural salvage feature in Star Citizen. Torsten, a representative of CIG, acknowledges the frustration surrounding the simplicity of the current implementation of structural salvage. He mentions that the feature was released faster than normal, resulting in a simplified version. However, he assures the community that they are still actively working to improve it and make it more complex. Torsten also mentions that they will be discussing their decisions and goals in more detail in an upcoming Inside Star Citizen (ISC) episode.
SaltEMike expresses concern about how players are reacting to early test beds, stating that major features like this one should align more closely with players’ expectations. He mentions that some comments below Torsten’s response suggest that the amount of alpha UEC (in-game currency) being awarded is too high and that the buffer size is not suitable for the Reclaimer ship. SaltEMike believes these issues could be resolved relatively quickly to address some of the problems.
SaltEMike acknowledges the heavy criticism CIG is receiving in the feedback threads regarding the current state of structural salvage. He mentions that, unlike some comments comparing it to the progression of mining in the game, he believes mining had a strong foundation from the start, unlike structural salvage. He explains that mining was tactile and required attention, whereas structural salvage involves simply left-clicking on a ship. SaltEMike emphasizes the need for a better delivery of the feature and suggests that CIG shares similar sentiments based on their response and comments.
SaltEMike recognizes that there are elements worth giving feedback on, such as the buffer, which he deems a positive addition to the gameplay. However, he stresses that improvements are needed regarding the claw and the fracturing of ships. Despite his concerns, he mentions that he still feels compelled to play and test the feature further.
In conclusion, SaltEMike expresses both concern and hope for the future of structural salvage in Star Citizen. He acknowledges the community’s dissatisfaction and the need for improvements, while also highlighting positive aspects of CIG’s response and actions taken so far.