The video features a comprehensive Q&A session from Harbor Unboxed during Computex, where hosts Steve and Tim discuss various topics related to the latest developments in the GPU and PC hardware industry. They start by highlighting their sponsors, MSI, Thermal Grizzly, GSkill, and Trikes, emphasizing their latest products designed for AMD Ryzen systems and high-performance cooling solutions. The hosts then delve into questions about AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) technology, specifically the future of FSR3 and FSR4. They suggest that FSR3 is nearing the end of its updates for older AMD GPUs, as the next generation FSR Redstone introduces AI-based features that require newer architectures like RDNA4, making backporting to older GPUs unlikely.
Next, the hosts address the performance and latency implications of using frame generation technology in gaming. They explain that while frame generation can smooth out gameplay at lower frame rates, it often results in worse overall experience due to increased latency and overhead. For example, attempting to upscale from 35 fps to 60 fps with frame generation can actually make gameplay feel worse, especially in fast-paced or single-player titles where responsiveness is critical. They express a desire for future improvements where frame generation could be implemented without such penalties, but currently, it remains a trade-off between visual smoothness and latency.
The discussion then shifts to Nvidia’s alleged blacklisting of Harbor Unboxed, which the hosts deem unlikely at this point. They reflect on their limited interactions with Nvidia during Computex, noting that the company has not shown major new products or engaged significantly with the media. They recall past incidents, such as the RTX 5060 review controversy, and believe Nvidia’s decision not to meet with them is more a reflection of their recent critical coverage rather than an active blacklist. The hosts also comment on Nvidia’s apparent disinterest in gaming GPUs, focusing instead on AI and data center markets, which reduces the likelihood of aggressive actions against reviewers.
Further, they analyze Nvidia’s product strategy, particularly the poor sales and availability of the RTX 5060 and 5060 Ti 8 GB cards. They suggest that these cards are primarily aimed at system integrators and pre-built systems, which often use lower-quality components and are less concerned with VRAM size or upgradability. The hosts criticize the practice of offering underwhelming, low-value GPUs at high prices, driven by Nvidia’s margins and partner demands, rather than consumer needs. They highlight how system integrators and OEMs contribute to the problem by pushing products that are designed to maximize profit rather than longevity or performance.
Finally, the hosts thank their sponsors and discuss upcoming content, including more parts of their Q&A series. They emphasize the importance of transparency and honest coverage, criticizing Nvidia and AMD for prioritizing profits over consumer interests. They also mention their efforts during the GPU review process, including the challenges of testing in Taipei and coordinating with MSI. Overall, the video offers an in-depth look at industry dynamics, product strategies, and the ongoing issues surrounding GPU availability, pricing, and the influence of manufacturers on the market.
